-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Typo in the formula of Bichon and Ranjan criteria, other points and question #828
Comments
Thank you for spotting and raising these! And yes, it is possible to use specific basis functions: there are various built-in functions and you can define your own, as described at https://gpflow.github.io/GPflow/develop/notebooks/getting_started/mean_functions.html. |
@hstojic could you please check the |
ok, I'll check it out - while we are at it, @uri-granta |
Thanks @uri-granta for your link. I'll take a closer look at the API documentation. |
Thanks for this nice package! I've got a few points.
The LaTeX formula for Bichon and Ranjan criteria seems wrong. In Equation (31) of the citer paper, we can read the conditionned GP$\xi(x)$ instead of its mean $m(x)$ , as currently written in the docstring.
Other points:
Question: is it possible to use specific basis functions for the GP mean?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: