From 38db707b6d5f728a9bae1607c66afc8b7af0753d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Moore Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 15:11:11 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] tests: rely on __SNR_xxx instead of __NR_xxx for syscalls We recently changed how libseccomp handles syscall numbers that are not defined natively, but we missed test #15. Signed-off-by: Paul Moore --- tests/15-basic-resolver.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/15-basic-resolver.c b/tests/15-basic-resolver.c index 6badef11..0c1eefeb 100644 --- a/tests/15-basic-resolver.c +++ b/tests/15-basic-resolver.c @@ -55,15 +55,15 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) unsigned int arch; char *name = NULL; - if (seccomp_syscall_resolve_name("open") != __NR_open) + if (seccomp_syscall_resolve_name("open") != __SNR_open) goto fail; - if (seccomp_syscall_resolve_name("read") != __NR_read) + if (seccomp_syscall_resolve_name("read") != __SNR_read) goto fail; if (seccomp_syscall_resolve_name("INVALID") != __NR_SCMP_ERROR) goto fail; rc = seccomp_syscall_resolve_name_rewrite(SCMP_ARCH_NATIVE, "openat"); - if (rc != __NR_openat) + if (rc != __SNR_openat) goto fail; while ((arch = arch_list[iter++]) != -1) {