-
Let's say I have a structure IEnumarable in C# and I want to pass that as some kind of js-context to the module. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 4 comments 1 reply
-
Maybe ChatGTP answered me my question 😊 In C#, IEnumerable is a lazy-evaluated sequence, which means it doesn't actually execute any operations on the collection until you start iterating through it. When you pass an IEnumerable to JavaScript, it might not trigger the enumeration automatically because JavaScript operates differently. To ensure that your IEnumerable is properly enumerated and its contents are available in your JavaScript context, you may need to explicitly force the enumeration on the C# side, such as by using .ToList(), which eagerly evaluates and materializes the sequence. However, there could be a few considerations to improve this situation: Documentation: Ensure that it's well-documented in your code or comments that when passing an IEnumerable to JavaScript, it's necessary to enumerate it first using .ToList() or a similar method. JavaScript Bridge: If you find yourself frequently passing data between C# and JavaScript, consider building a more robust JavaScript bridge that handles these conversions automatically, abstracting away the need for explicit enumeration. Performance: Be cautious with using .ToList() on large collections, as it eagerly loads all data into memory. Depending on your use case, you might want to explore alternatives like streaming data from C# to JavaScript. Testing and Debugging: Ensure you have adequate unit tests and debugging mechanisms in place to catch issues related to the interaction between C# and JavaScript. Remember that the behavior of IEnumerable in C# and how it interacts with JavaScript might vary depending on the specific context and libraries you are using. Careful consideration of these factors and clear documentation can help make your code more robust and maintainable. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
ChatGPT got that pretty much right. To sum it, Jint cannot safely materialize anything so it's been a design choice not to do anything. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Any Idea how the "JavaScript Bridge" could be implemented? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Something like this? Just throwing out some ideas. public class Tests
{
[Fact]
public void Run()
{
var engine = new Engine();
engine.SetValue("enumerable", GetEnumerable());
engine.Execute("""
function foreachDotnetIEnumarable(enumarable, action) {
var enumerator = enumarable.GetEnumerator();
while (enumerator.MoveNext()) {
action(enumerator.Current);
}
}
""");
engine.Execute("""
var result = '';
foreachDotnetIEnumarable(enumerable, function (item) {
result += item;
});
""");
Assert.Equal("abcdHello", engine.GetValue("result").AsString());
}
public IEnumerable<string> GetEnumerable()
{
yield return "a";
yield return "b";
yield return "c";
yield return "d";
yield return "Hello";
}
} |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
ChatGPT got that pretty much right. To sum it, Jint cannot safely materialize anything so it's been a design choice not to do anything.