-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow alternative fs to be provided via options #14
Comments
Have submitted a PR as it seemed fairly straightforward. |
As no response I created a fork in the end and have put change there. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The background on this is here: pahen/madge#186
I am working my way through the stack, and anything that directly uses
fs
I am seeing if we can allow an alternativefs
implementation to be passed in. This allows some interesting scenarios like supporting virtual file systems, with things likeunionfs
andmemfs
.Would you be open to a PR that allows an additional
fileSystem
option to be passed in, and if it is, will use that instead of the defaultfs
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: