Replies: 1 comment
-
Thanks for the question and sorry for not responding earlier. This is something that we need to improve on the Bloop side, which is already implemented in one of the forks and we need to merge it back. Namely, it will used named sockets instead of a well known port. Your workaround is probably the only workaround currently. Alternatively, if you are using mill or sbt you can try using them as BSP servers, which will be started once per workspace. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I would like to use vscode Metals along with the Remote - SSH extension. We have a powerful development linux box that several developers share.
With defaults, we have only been successful with a single developer at-a-time running vscode Remote - SSH with remote metals.
We suspect the root cause is the following restriction from the bloop server:
The default port for bloop is 8212 -- does the above limitation goes deeper than the port number?
Again, using defaults, when I try to have a second user start metals via Remote - SSH, the logs show something like this:
One approach I found is to set unique values for metals.bloop-port for each user, e.g., in their
.bash_profile
on the dev server:Is there a better or standard way to have multiple users use Remote - SSH on a single linux dev box? Can all users share a single bloop instance? If so, how?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions