Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

quasar is spamming DNS requests for google.com #64

Closed
trisk opened this issue Feb 4, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

quasar is spamming DNS requests for google.com #64

trisk opened this issue Feb 4, 2016 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@trisk
Copy link

trisk commented Feb 4, 2016

This issue is identical to steeve#208

I noticed pulsar was sending DNS requests for the google.com. A and AAAA records once every second. I removed it and installed plugin.video.quasar 0.9.3 just now, but the problem is still occurring.

The threads in the quasar daemon process are doing the google.com. lookup followed by connecting a socket to UDP port 9 on one of the addresses returned by the lookup, registering the socket with epoll, then almost immediately closing the socket without sending any traffic.

OpenELEC does not cache the DNS results so the lookups might be side effects of regular calls to net.Dial. The lookup/connect/close every second seems like strange behaviour, though.

@scakemyer
Copy link
Owner

Got me worried for a second, then remembered I had completely removed the GA tracking, so at least that's not it. But you're right, it's doing a lookup every second here. I don't like that either.

@trisk
Copy link
Author

trisk commented Feb 5, 2016

Sorry for opening the bug in the wrong place, for some reason I was under the impression the daemon wasn't open source (though it appears to be missing a licence still?). Would make more sense to have the connectivity check triggered by a connection timeout, I think.

@scakemyer
Copy link
Owner

It's ok to file most issues here, and yes I'll be looking into changing the connectivity check, or feel free to make a PR on the daemon's repo.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants