From c08b437e9d329dc01856a6947deda4a5bbcb5dc7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ed Page Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 09:50:10 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] docs(charter): Declare new Intentional Artifacts as 'small' changes That means these will only need an FCP to take ownership, including updating the charter, rather than an RFC. --- src/doc/contrib/src/team.md | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/src/doc/contrib/src/team.md b/src/doc/contrib/src/team.md index e8044e6d91fa..74576f3ee863 100644 --- a/src/doc/contrib/src/team.md +++ b/src/doc/contrib/src/team.md @@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ The degree of process is correlated with the degree of change being proposed: These decisions are usually processed via private channels by the entirety of the team. - A change that is a "one-way door". That is, something that is difficult to reverse without breaking backwards compatibility. + - New or transferred "Intentional Artifact" crates to the team, see also [Rust crate ownership policy](https://forge.rust-lang.org/policies/crate-ownership.html) - Larger features should usually go through the [RFC process]. This usually involves first soliciting feedback from the Cargo team and the rest of the community, often via the [Rust Internals] discussion board, [Cargo's issue tracker], and the [Zulip] channel.