Should we change the name of the repository or the organization to rudof?

[labra]

At this moment the project is part of the weso organization which is mainly a research lab where I work at the University of Oviedo (WESO = WEb Semantics Oviedo). Although I am happy with it...I think it would probably make the project more scalable if we use rudofproject as a top level organization and we put inside it, rudof as a repository for shapes-rs.

My main reason is that I think in the long term more people would be happier to collaborate or participate in an organization that is not specifically mentioning Oviedo in it's name than if we keep it inside weso...

Does anyone have an opinion in favour or against this change?

[angelip2303]

I believe this is an excellent approach, as it aligns well with best practices and better suits the project's intended scope. It will also help us maintain a more organized structure by defining each complementary repository within the rudof organization, rather than attaching them to the main WESO organization.

[labra]

Now the project is in its own organization rudof-project