-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
building binary without rust stdlib #58
Comments
Advantages and disadvantages of using no_std. Advantage:
Disadvantages:
|
there are two things I want to clarify:
|
Because until now, the target This is the only target that supports the no_std feature. And for the no_std feature, there is no OS and no C library. |
syscalls:
stdlib:
no_std: write exit brk
30 vs 3
thanks to @shelmesky. I used his releases(a little program which is hello world level), and listed syscalls in them.
no_std could help us to reduce much of the workload in syscall implementation.
The syscalls needed by no_std will be tier1, and others will be tier2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: