Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Benchmark: Thin ResNet #16

Open
ClashLuke opened this issue Mar 17, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Benchmark: Thin ResNet #16

ClashLuke opened this issue Mar 17, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@ClashLuke
Copy link

ClashLuke commented Mar 17, 2020

Default ResNet-18 with one quarter of the usual width and its performance can be seen in this notebook (with outputs).
The best accuracy achieved (on K49) is 98.29%. Please excuse K49 being called KMNIST inside of the notebook.

As minor dataset augmentation and adaptive learning rate scheduling are used, which are both not part of the original ResNet paper, this might have to be marked differently though.

Below "Dense" means that the InDeDeNet was used. Exploration is done on K49, implying that results can be shared as well.

Using the notebook above, here are a few more configurations

Dense Width Factor Depth Parameters Accuracy
False 1/4 10 535.2k 96.82
False 1/3 10 584.4k 97.22
True 1/4 10 598.3K 97.52
False 1/3 18 1.2M 98.14
False 1/4 101 2.6M 98.20
False 1/2 18 2.8M 98.28
True 1/2 10 2.4M 98.28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant