Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Pretty Minor] Issue with electron apps when running with proxychains4 #586

Open
0XC7R opened this issue Nov 13, 2024 · 7 comments
Open

Comments

@0XC7R
Copy link

0XC7R commented Nov 13, 2024

Config and other information has not changed since my last issue post which is here: #585

I will add new config and other edits if needed in the future.

Not sure if it is either electrum or proxychains related issue. When running an app that uses electrum like discord, signal etc you will be required to add --no-sandbox --in-process-gpu at the end of the target if you want to route its traffic through proxychains and have it boot successfully.
If you do not parse the workaround above then the process will just throw an error and exit which is supplied at the bottom and in the screenshot below

Although this work around does not always work with some applications like discord as I had to flatpak install it for it to work compared to the debian install.

I will provide a screenshot below to help show the issue:
image
The second time I had run signal with proxychains and also parsing the workaround mentioned above is a successful start and run. The above is pretty obvious.

Console output in event of error:

┌─╼[~]
 └╼ ❯❯❯ proxychains4 signal-desktop                              
[proxychains] DLL init: proxychains-ng 4.17
[proxychains] config file found: /etc/proxychains.conf
[proxychains] preloading /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libproxychains.so.4
[proxychains] DLL init: proxychains-ng 4.17
[proxychains] DLL init: proxychains-ng 4.17
[proxychains] DLL init: proxychains-ng 4.17
[12627:1113/182953.017777:FATAL:zygote_host_impl_linux.cc(221)] Check failed: . : Invalid argument (22)
[1]    12627 trace trap  proxychains4 signal-desktop
@0XC7R
Copy link
Author

0XC7R commented Nov 13, 2024

I don't think it really has much to do with proxychains however I thought I would mention it just in case including anyone who may encounter this in the future.

@rofl0r rofl0r changed the title [Pretty Minor] Issue with electrum apps when running with proxychains4 [Pretty Minor] Issue with electron apps when running with proxychains4 Nov 13, 2024
@rofl0r
Copy link
Owner

rofl0r commented Nov 13, 2024

that's a known issue - search for sandbox in the issues. though it's nice that you document a workaround, which may be useful for some.

@0XC7R
Copy link
Author

0XC7R commented Nov 13, 2024

that's a known issue - search for sandbox in the issues. though it's nice that you document a workaround, which may be useful for some.

Interesting. Kind of a flaw but is nothing really.

The work around doesn't always work for some apps like I said which means you would need to find an additional work around if you cannot use flatpak to install the same application.
Theyre the only two workarounds I have really found. I have no clue why the deb install of apps like discord works differently compared to flatpak installation.

@0XC7R
Copy link
Author

0XC7R commented Nov 13, 2024

Up to you but you could add this issue to the read me or I can make a pull request to add it.

@rofl0r
Copy link
Owner

rofl0r commented Nov 19, 2024

i'll probably add some detail to the README next time i work on it. though it seems most people don't read it anyway. there's constantly issues opened claiming proxychains doesn't work when they test it with ping even though the very first paragraph makes it clear that only TCP is supported...

@0XC7R
Copy link
Author

0XC7R commented Nov 27, 2024

i'll probably add some detail to the README next time i work on it. though it seems most people don't read it anyway. there's constantly issues opened claiming proxychains doesn't work when they test it with ping even though the very first paragraph makes it clear that only TCP is supported...

"Ask dumb questions get no answers" thats the way I see it.

Also you could add a header 1 to the very very top acting as a notice and if they do not listen to it you can just close the posts which will save you a bit of time, they're unable to ignore it then 😉 .

Been busy sorry for the late reply celebrated something. Also had to repair a randomly corrupted HDD volume so fun.

@0XC7R
Copy link
Author

0XC7R commented Nov 27, 2024

i'll probably add some detail to the README next time i work on it. though it seems most people don't read it anyway. there's constantly issues opened claiming proxychains doesn't work when they test it with ping even though the very first paragraph makes it clear that only TCP is supported...

"Ask dumb questions get no answers" thats the way I see it.

Also you could add a header 1 to the very very top acting as a notice and if they do not listen to it you can just close the posts which will save you a bit of time, they're unable to ignore it then 😉 .

Been busy sorry for the late reply celebrated something. Also had to repair a randomly corrupted HDD volume so fun.

One thing I forgot to mention is issue templates. I have my own set on my own github project (Quick-Short if you want to copy the template). You can use these to your advantage by slapping a warning inside about TCP only or whatever else.

0XC7R added a commit to 0XC7R/proxychains-ng that referenced this issue Nov 27, 2024
like I said in our issue: rofl0r#586 you could implement a way to notify users within issue templates if they don't read the readme.
@0XC7R 0XC7R mentioned this issue Nov 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants