You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It's possible to declare a package->repository stanza without declaring a 'name' for the repo. I believe the implicit 'all' repo is used in this case, but since the all repo is not synced typically, this can be problematic and cause confusion when writing catalog configs.
Possibly one workaround would be to enable a 'default' repository (alongside
all') which packages would be automatically "tagged" into upon completion of build.
Reproduction Steps
Create a catalog with a package and repository stanza declaring Name-Architectures for binary rpms, but without a 'name' in the repository stanza
Expected Behavior
An error is thrown due to declaring a package/repository without a name
Version and Build Information
HEAD
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe The Bug
It's possible to declare a package->repository stanza without declaring a 'name' for the repo. I believe the implicit 'all' repo is used in this case, but since the all repo is not synced typically, this can be problematic and cause confusion when writing catalog configs.
Possibly one workaround would be to enable a 'default' repository (alongside
all') which packages would be automatically "tagged" into upon completion of build.
Reproduction Steps
Expected Behavior
An error is thrown due to declaring a package/repository without a name
Version and Build Information
HEAD
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: