Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support OSCAL POA&M Export #30

Open
xee5ch opened this issue Aug 23, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Support OSCAL POA&M Export #30

xee5ch opened this issue Aug 23, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@xee5ch
Copy link

xee5ch commented Aug 23, 2022

First time caller, long-time listener from oscal.club. Hello! I like this app, but had not noticed this gem in the Risk Redux portfolio until I heard people mention it today. Would you be interested in adding OSCAL POA&M export? Let me know and I can try to dust off my RoR knowledge and chip in, or just cheer from the sidelines, whatever works with this project.

Either way, very nice work!

@egyptiankarim
Copy link
Contributor

Would you be interested in adding OSCAL POA&M export?

Oh! I like that idea! How would you imagine something like that working, exactly, though? Are you thinking it'd be augmenting the "recommendations" we capture as a part of the objects we create in risqué? Or are you thinking more like a totally separate app that can be used to draft up POAMs on their own? I can potentially see either working really well, but the separate app idea feels like a more flexible approach.

@egyptiankarim egyptiankarim added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 27, 2022
@xee5ch
Copy link
Author

xee5ch commented Oct 1, 2022

Oh! I like that idea! How would you imagine something like that working, exactly, though? Are you thinking it'd be augmenting the "recommendations" we capture as a part of the objects we create in risqué? Or are you thinking more like a totally separate app that can be used to draft up POAMs on their own? I can potentially see either working really well, but the separate app idea feels like a more flexible approach.

This is interesting. I was thinking more towards the former. The latter is a big lift (or a significant shift from the current vision of the app), right? Let me play around with the app and get back to you maybe? :-)

@xee5ch
Copy link
Author

xee5ch commented Oct 1, 2022

I'd say one of the bigger issues, after quickly reorienting myself and playing with Risque (love the simplicity in UX and interface, BTW) is OSCAL is systemic and wants to make a POA&M that links back to a Assessment Result (AR), and that AR to an Assessment Plan (AP), and that AP should link back to a SSP describing the system assessed. I think I need to investigate how much "stuff" you can get away with in only in a POA&M if you want and stub out saying "we have UUIDs for those things from another API or tool, I am an expert user" or just leave them blank for now.

Anyway, this is an interesting challenge to explore. I guess I could come up with some ideas and you can tell how reasonable or unreasonable that is for the context of this app?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants