We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Some instructions' "definedBy" fields appear to be incorrect, using an open comma-separated list, rather than a subfield refinement with "allOf".
./arch/inst/F/fmaxm.s.yaml:definedBy: F, Zfa ./arch/inst/F/froundnx.s.yaml:definedBy: F, Zfa ./arch/inst/F/fround.s.yaml:definedBy: F, Zfa ./arch/inst/F/fltq.s.yaml:definedBy: F, Zfa ./arch/inst/F/fleq.s.yaml:definedBy: F, Zfa ./arch/inst/F/fli.s.yaml:definedBy: F, Zfa ./arch/inst/F/fminm.s.yaml:definedBy: F, Zfa
I think each of these should be expanded to:
definedBy: allOf: - F - Zfa
Although, since Unpriv spec Version 20240411 says:
The Zfa extension depends on the F extension
maybe only the Zfa extension needs to be called out as the "definedBy" extension?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Some instructions' "definedBy" fields appear to be incorrect, using an open comma-separated list, rather than a subfield refinement with "allOf".
I think each of these should be expanded to:
Although, since Unpriv spec Version 20240411 says:
maybe only the Zfa extension needs to be called out as the "definedBy" extension?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: