You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Especially the problem when writing in small blocks. This is an important issue because some programs write in small blocks and this is not under our control.
If we take a sufficiently large 64k buffer (a fairly universal and reasonable choice, since it does not lead to a loss of speed in almost any case), then the speed drops by 3-4 times.
Thank you for the detailed report. The comparison with encfs is most helpful. Especially at 4k, looks like gocryptfs could do much better. I will check what the difference is.
Especially the problem when writing in small blocks. This is an important issue because some programs write in small blocks and this is not under our control.
If we take a sufficiently large 64k buffer (a fairly universal and reasonable choice, since it does not lead to a loss of speed in almost any case), then the speed drops by 3-4 times.
gocryptfs 2.4.0
gocryptfs -fg -notifypid=23471 /mnt/gluster/gocrypt /mnt/gluster-gocrypt -o rw,noprealloc,passfile=/home/duke/gocrypt-pwd.txt,allow_other,kernel_cache,dev,suid
glusterfs:
gocryptfs over glusterfs:
encfs over glusterfs:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: