Extract and display module reasons #2965
Conversation
Job #9660: Bundle Size — 304.27KiB (+0.13%).
Metrics (3 changes)
Total size by type (2 changes)
|
vio
force-pushed
the
module-reasons
branch
3 times, most recently
from
45094c1
to
4c30cbb
Compare
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
vio
force-pushed
the
module-reasons
branch
3 times, most recently
from
41945b3
to
fc1dba7
Compare
vio
force-pushed
the
module-reasons
branch
2 times, most recently
from
afb9e74
to
eb584d8
Compare
vio
force-pushed
the
module-reasons
branch
2 times, most recently
from
6afe0d6
to
006f834
Compare
WalkthroughThe changes made in this pull request primarily enhance the handling and representation of module reasons within the webpack plugin and validation modules. A new Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
packages/utils/src/i18n.js (1)
10-10: Consider plural consistency in constant naming.The constant follows the established naming pattern, but consider using plural form
COMPONENT_LINK_MODULES_INFOfor consistency with other module-related constants likeCOMPONENT_LINK_MODULES,COMPONENT_LINK_MODULES_DUPLICATE, etc.packages/plugin-webpack-validate/src/index.ts (2)
52-52: Consider handling undefined explanation field.While adding the explanation to the failure output improves error reporting, we should ensure it's handled gracefully when undefined.
Consider this safer implementation:
- const failureOutput = ['', failure.message, `Path: ${failure.path.join('.')}`, failure.explanation]; + const failureOutput = ['', failure.message, `Path: ${failure.path.join('.')}`]; + if (failure.explanation) { + failureOutput.push(failure.explanation); + }This change would:
- Maintain consistent error formatting even when explanations are missing
- Prevent potential undefined values in the output
52-52: Consider structured error format for better integration.Given that this PR focuses on improving module reason display, consider returning a structured error object instead of a string. This would allow better integration with UI components and potentially enable better error handling downstream.
Example structure:
interface ValidationError { message: string; failures: Array<{ message: string; path: string[]; explanation?: string; }>; }This would provide more flexibility in how errors are displayed and processed, especially when showing module reasons in the UI.
packages/plugin-webpack-validate/src/schemas.ts (1)
25-27: Consider enriching the WebpackSourceModuleReasonStruct with additional metadata.The current structure captures only the module name. Consider adding more fields that webpack provides for better debugging and visualization:
type: The type of dependency (e.g., 'import', 'require')userRequest: The original request pathloc: Source location informationexport const WebpackSourceModuleReasonStruct = type({ module: optional(nullable(string())), + type: optional(string()), + userRequest: optional(string()), + loc: optional(string()), });packages/utils/src/webpack/types.ts (1)
61-61: Add JSDoc documentation for the reasons property.The addition of the
reasonsproperty aligns well with the PR objectives. However, consider adding JSDoc documentation to explain its purpose and expected content.export interface Module extends MetricRun { /* Module name */ name: string; /* Array of chunk IDs */ chunkIds: Array<string>; /* Flag to identify if the module is duplicated on the current job */ duplicated?: boolean; + /* Array of reasons explaining why this module is included in the bundle */ reasons?: Array<string>; }packages/plugin-webpack-validate/src/__tests__/index.ts (2)
43-47: Enhance test coverage for module reasons.While the test validates basic reason structure, consider adding test cases for:
- Multiple reasons per module
- Additional reason properties (e.g., type, loc)
- Invalid reason structures
reasons: [ { module: './index.js', + type: 'import()', + loc: 'line 10:1', }, + { + module: './another.js', + type: 'require()', + }, ],
Line range hint
134-152: Add negative test cases for module reasons validation.The "should return message if data is missing" section should include test cases for invalid reason structures. Consider adding:
- Invalid reason properties
- Missing required reason fields
- Malformed reason arrays
expect( validate({ assets: [{ name: 'main.js', size: 100 }], modules: [{ name: 'module-a', size: 10, chunks: [1] }], chunks: [{ id: 1 }], }), ).toMatch(/entry/); +expect( + validate({ + assets: [{ name: 'main.js', size: 100 }], + modules: [{ + name: 'module-a', + size: 10, + chunks: [1], + reasons: [{ invalid: true }], + }], + }), +).toMatch(/reason/);packages/plugin-webpack-filter/src/index.ts (2)
23-25: Add JSDoc documentation for better maintainability.The interface structure is well-defined and aligns with the PR objectives. Consider adding JSDoc documentation to explain the purpose of this interface and its properties.
+/** + * Represents a module that depends on the current module. + */ export interface WebpackStatsFilteredModuleReason { + /** The identifier of the dependent module */ module: string; }
52-72: Consider adding input validation and type safety improvements.The function effectively handles deduplication of module reasons and follows good practices. Consider these improvements:
- Add input validation
- Use a more explicit type for the Record
const getReasons = ( moduleData: StatsModule, ): Array<WebpackStatsFilteredModuleReason> | undefined => { + if (!moduleData) { + return undefined; + } - const reasonsByModule: Record<string, WebpackStatsFilteredModuleReason> = {}; + const reasonsByModule: Record<string, WebpackStatsFilteredModuleReason | undefined> = Object.create(null); moduleData.reasons?.forEach((reason) => { // Add the reason module only once // webpack adds one entry for import and one entry for every reference if (reason.module && !reasonsByModule[reason.module]) { reasonsByModule[reason.module] = { module: reason.module }; } }); const reasons = Object.values(reasonsByModule).filter((r): r is WebpackStatsFilteredModuleReason => r !== undefined); if (reasons.length === 0) { return undefined; } return reasons; };packages/utils/src/webpack/extract/__tests__/modules.ts (1)
45-45: Consider expanding test coverage for module reasons.While the current test case verifies basic functionality, consider adding test cases for:
- Modules with multiple reasons
- Modules with no reasons
- Modules with circular dependencies
Here's a suggested test case to add:
test('should extract modules with various reason scenarios', () => { const actual = extractModules({ ...fixtures, modules: [ { name: 'module-a', size: 1000, chunks: [1], reasons: ['module-b', 'module-c'] // Multiple reasons }, { name: 'module-b', size: 2000, chunks: [1], reasons: [] // No reasons }, { name: 'module-c', size: 3000, chunks: [1], reasons: ['module-a'] // Circular dependency } ], }); expect(actual.metrics.modules).toMatchObject({ 'module-a': { reasons: ['module-b', 'module-c'] }, 'module-b': { reasons: [] }, 'module-c': { reasons: ['module-a'] } }); });packages/utils/__fixtures__/webpack-stats-1.js (1)
191-204: Consider using relative paths in test fixtures.The structure of the
reasonsproperty looks good and aligns with the PR objective of extracting module reasons. However, themoduleIdentifieruses absolute paths which might make tests environment-dependent.Consider using relative paths instead:
reasons: [ { moduleId: 10, - moduleIdentifier: '/usr/share/app/node_modules/package-a/index.js', + moduleIdentifier: 'node_modules/package-a/index.js', module: 'node_modules/package-a/index.js', userLoc: '1:0-20', }, { moduleId: 10, - moduleIdentifier: '/usr/share/app/node_modules/package-a/index.js', + moduleIdentifier: 'node_modules/package-a/index.js', module: 'node_modules/package-a/index.js', userLoc: '3:0-20', }, ],packages/ui/src/components/module-info/module-info.tsx (1)
310-333: The reasons section implementation looks good, but could benefit from some enhancements.The implementation correctly displays module reasons and provides navigation to dependent modules. However, consider the following improvements:
- Add accessibility support for screen readers
- Optimize performance with memoization
- Handle empty state and loading state
- Add explicit type definition for the reasons property
Consider applying these enhancements:
+ // Add type for reasons + interface ModuleRun { + reasons?: string[]; + // ... other properties + } {item?.runs?.[0].reasons && ( <EntryInfo.Meta label="Reasons"> - <ul className={css.reasons}> + <ul className={css.reasons} aria-label="Module dependencies"> + {item.runs[0].reasons.length === 0 ? ( + <li>No dependencies found</li> + ) : ( {item.runs[0].reasons.map((reason) => ( <li key={reason}> <EntryInfoMetaLink as={CustomComponentLink} section={SECTIONS.MODULES} params={{ [COMPONENT.BUNDLE_MODULES]: { filters: {}, search: '', entryId: reason, }, }} className={css.reasonLink} + aria-label={`Navigate to dependent module ${reason}`} > <FileName name={reason} className={css.reason} /> </EntryInfoMetaLink> </li> ))} + )} </ul> </EntryInfo.Meta> )} + // Add memoization for reasons list + const memoizedReasons = useMemo( + () => + item?.runs?.[0].reasons?.map((reason) => ( + <li key={reason}> + <EntryInfoMetaLink + // ... existing props + > + <FileName name={reason} className={css.reason} /> + </EntryInfoMetaLink> + </li> + )), + [item?.runs?.[0].reasons] + );
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
packages/utils/src/jobs/__tests__/__snapshots__/create-job.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/utils/src/report/__tests__/__snapshots__/create.ts.snapis excluded by!**/*.snappackages/utils/src/webpack/__tests__/__snapshots__/compare.js.snapis excluded by!**/*.snap
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
packages/plugin-webpack-filter/src/index.ts(4 hunks)packages/plugin-webpack-validate/src/__tests__/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/plugin-webpack-validate/src/index.ts(1 hunks)packages/plugin-webpack-validate/src/schemas.ts(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/module-info/module-info.module.css(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/module-info/module-info.tsx(3 hunks)packages/utils/__fixtures__/webpack-stats-1.extracted.js(1 hunks)packages/utils/__fixtures__/webpack-stats-1.js(1 hunks)packages/utils/src/i18n.js(1 hunks)packages/utils/src/utils/component-links.ts(1 hunks)packages/utils/src/webpack/extract/__tests__/modules.ts(1 hunks)packages/utils/src/webpack/extract/modules.ts(2 hunks)packages/utils/src/webpack/types.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/ui/src/components/module-info/module-info.module.css
🔇 Additional comments (15)
packages/utils/__fixtures__/webpack-stats-1.extracted.js (1)
51-55: LGTM: The reasons property structure is correct.
The added reasons property correctly represents the module dependency relationship, showing that package-c is required by package-a.
packages/utils/src/i18n.js (1)
10-10: Verify the constant usage.
The constant addition looks good. Let's verify its usage in the ModuleInfo component and ensure there are no hardcoded strings that should use this constant instead.
✅ Verification successful
The constant is properly used and no hardcoded strings were found.
The verification shows that:
- The constant
COMPONENT_LINK_MODULEis correctly used inpackages/utils/src/utils/component-links.ts - The ModuleInfo component doesn't contain any hardcoded "View module information" strings that should be using this constant
- The stories file also doesn't contain any instances of hardcoded strings that should be using this constant
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the new i18n constant and find any potential hardcoded strings
# Test 1: Find direct usage of the constant
rg "COMPONENT_LINK_MODULE" --type ts --type tsx
# Test 2: Look for potential hardcoded strings that should use the constant
rg -i "view module (information|info)" --type ts --type tsx
# Test 3: Check ModuleInfo component specifically
fd -e tsx -e ts "module-info" --exec rg -l "View module"
Length of output: 222
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try without file type restrictions since the repository might use different extensions
# Also expanding the search patterns for better coverage
# Search for the constant usage
rg "COMPONENT_LINK_MODULE"
# Look for potential hardcoded strings
rg -i "view\s+module"
# Find module info related files
fd "module.*info" --type f
Length of output: 1411
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the ModuleInfo component implementation for any hardcoded strings
cat packages/ui/src/components/module-info/module-info.tsx
# Also check the story file for any hardcoded strings
cat packages/ui/src/components/module-info/module-info.stories.tsx
Length of output: 12039
packages/plugin-webpack-validate/src/index.ts (1)
52-52: Verify typing for the failure object.
Let's ensure proper typing for the validation failure object to maintain type safety.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the failure object usage and typing.
Let me check the schema definition and superstruct types one final time to complete the verification.
Type safety for failure object is properly maintained
The failure object is correctly typed through superstruct's validation system:
- The
validate()function is properly imported from 'superstruct' - The schema
WebpackSourceStructis well-defined with comprehensive type definitions - The failure object is obtained through the standard superstruct validation result's
failures()method - Usage of failure properties (message, path, explanation) aligns with superstruct's Failure type
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the typing of the failure object from superstruct
# Search for any type definitions related to validation failures
rg -t ts "interface.*Failure" --glob "!node_modules"
# Check if there are any existing type imports from superstruct
rg -t ts "import.*from 'superstruct'" --glob "!node_modules"
Length of output: 209
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the context around the failure object usage
rg -t ts "failure\." -B 5 -A 5 --glob "!node_modules"
# Check imports and type definitions in the specific file
cat packages/plugin-webpack-validate/src/index.ts
# Look for validate usage patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'validate($_, $_)'
Length of output: 2462
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the schema definition
cat packages/plugin-webpack-validate/src/schemas.ts
# Look for any additional type definitions from superstruct
rg -t ts "import.*from '@superstructjs|import.*from 'superstruct'" -B 2 -A 2 --glob "!node_modules"
Length of output: 1916
packages/utils/src/webpack/types.ts (1)
61-61: Verify type consistency across related files.
The type definition looks correct. Let's verify that this type is consistently used across the codebase, particularly in the webpack plugin and validation modules mentioned in the AI summary.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a conclusive response about the type consistency:
Type consistency for reasons property is verified across the codebase
The Array<string> type for the reasons property is consistently used and properly implemented:
- The type definition in
packages/utils/src/webpack/types.tsis the source of truth - Implementation in
packages/utils/src/webpack/extract/modules.tscorrectly maps reasons to string array - Usage in
packages/plugin-webpack-filter/src/index.tsandpackages/plugin-webpack-validate/src/schemas.tsmaintains type consistency - Test fixtures in
packages/utils/src/webpack/extract/__tests__/modules.tsdemonstrate correct usage with string arrays
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the consistency of Module interface usage and reasons property type
# Expected: All implementations should use Array<string> for reasons property
# Search for Module interface implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ extends Module {
$$$
}'
# Search for direct usage of the reasons property
rg -A 2 'reasons.*:.*Array<string>'
# Search for assignments to the reasons property
rg -A 2 'reasons.*=.*\[.*\]'
Length of output: 267
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to understand the usage of Module interface and reasons property
# Find all files that mention Module interface
rg -l "interface.*Module"
# Search for any usage of reasons property in a broader context
rg -B 2 -A 2 "reasons[?:]"
# Search for imports of Module type
rg "import.*Module.*from"
# Look for any webpack-related type definitions
fd "types?.ts" --exec grep -l "webpack"
Length of output: 9127
packages/plugin-webpack-validate/src/__tests__/index.ts (1)
52-56: Verify handling of duplicate reasons between parent and child modules.
The child module has identical reasons as its parent module. Please clarify:
- Is this duplication intentional?
- Should child modules inherit reasons from their parent?
- How should validation handle duplicate reasons?
✅ Verification successful
Based on the test file content and webpack stats fixture, I can now generate the final response:
Duplicate reasons between parent and child modules are valid in webpack concatenated modules
Looking at the test file, this is a valid test case that verifies webpack's concatenated modules behavior. The duplication of reasons is intentional because:
- The parent module represents a concatenated bundle ("./main.js + 2 concatenated modules")
- Each module within the concatenation maintains its own metadata, including reasons
- The test validates that both parent and child can have their own reasons, which is consistent with webpack's module concatenation output format
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar patterns in webpack source code to understand the expected behavior
ast-grep --pattern 'module.reasons = $_' # Search for reason assignment patterns
rg -A 5 'concatenatedModule.*reasons' # Search for reason handling in concatenated modules
Length of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to understand the test context and validation logic
# Search for test files containing webpack validation tests
fd "test|spec" -e ts -e js --exec rg -l "webpack.*validate|validate.*webpack"
# Search for reason-related patterns in test files
rg -A 5 "reasons.*module"
# Look for webpack validation logic
fd "validate|webpack" -e ts -e js --exec rg -l "reasons"
Length of output: 2237
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the webpack stats fixtures and the test file in question more closely
# Check the webpack stats fixture content
cat packages/utils/__fixtures__/webpack-stats-1.js
# Look at the specific test file content
cat packages/plugin-webpack-validate/src/__tests__/index.ts
# Check for any validation rules related to reasons
rg -A 5 "validate.*reasons|reasons.*validate" packages/plugin-webpack-validate/
Length of output: 8742
packages/utils/src/webpack/extract/modules.ts (2)
108-108: LGTM! Clean implementation of module reasons extraction.
The implementation effectively extracts and normalizes module reasons, aligning with the PR objective to surface module dependencies.
115-115: LGTM! Verify UI integration of module reasons.
The conditional inclusion of reasons is implemented cleanly. Since this is part of the module reasons feature, let's verify its integration with the UI components.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response as we have sufficient information about the module reasons implementation and its integration:
LGTM - Module reasons are properly integrated in the codebase
The reasons property is correctly implemented and integrated throughout the codebase:
- Properly typed in
WebpackStatsFilteredModuleinterface withreasons?: Array<WebpackStatsFilteredModuleReason> - Extracted and normalized in
extractModulesfunction - Consumed by the UI components through the
BundleModulesandModuleInfocomponents - Handled by the webpack filter plugin for proper data transformation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the UI components properly handle the new reasons property
# Test: Search for UI components that should display module reasons
rg -t tsx -t jsx "reasons.*module" --glob "!**/__tests__/**"
# Test: Check for any TypeScript interfaces that should be updated to include the reasons property
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $name {
$$$
reasons?: string[];
$$$
}'
Length of output: 167
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find UI components and interfaces
# Search for any UI components or types handling module reasons
rg -t ts -t js "reasons.*module|module.*reasons" -B 2 -A 2
# Look for interfaces or types related to modules
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $name {
$$$
}'
# Also search for type definitions containing "Module"
ast-grep --pattern 'type $name = {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 2042
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the types and interfaces specifically for module reasons
# Look for type definitions of module reasons
ast-grep --pattern 'type WebpackStatsFilteredModuleReason = {
$$$
}'
# Check for interfaces or types that consume the reasons
ast-grep --pattern 'interface WebpackStatsFilteredModule {
$$$
}'
# Search for any UI components in the packages directory
rg -t ts -t js "import.*Module|export.*Module" -B 2 -A 2 packages/
Length of output: 29578
packages/plugin-webpack-filter/src/index.ts (2)
31-31: LGTM! Interface updates are consistent and well-typed.
The optional reasons property is appropriately added to both interfaces, maintaining consistency in the type system.
Also applies to: 37-37
143-148: Verify the integration with webpack's module structure.
The integration of reasons is clean and consistent. Let's verify that we're handling all possible webpack module structures correctly.
Also applies to: 156-163
✅ Verification successful
Integration with webpack's module structure is correctly implemented
The implementation correctly handles webpack's module structure:
- The
getReasonsfunction properly processes module reasons from webpack's stats - The integration is consistent between concatenated and root modules
- The interface
WebpackStatsFilteredModulecorrectly defines the structure with optional reasons - The spread operator pattern
...(reasons && { reasons })safely handles undefined cases
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for webpack module type definitions to ensure we handle all cases
rg -t ts "interface.*Module.*{" --glob "node_modules/webpack/**/*.d.ts" -A 10
Length of output: 183
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find webpack module types and their usage
# First, let's look for files that might contain module type definitions
fd -e ts -e d.ts . | grep -i "module"
# Then let's search for Module-related interfaces and types
rg -t ts "(?:interface|type).*Module"
# Also search for getReasons usage to understand the context better
ast-grep --pattern 'function getReasons($_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 3471
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the getReasons implementation and its usage context
rg -t ts "getReasons" -B 5 -A 10
# Also look at the WebpackStatsFilteredModule interface implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'interface WebpackStatsFilteredModule {
$$$
}'
# And check the actual module processing logic around the area of concern
rg -t ts "concatenatedModule" -B 3 -A 3
Length of output: 7464
packages/utils/src/webpack/extract/__tests__/modules.ts (1)
45-45: LGTM! The reasons property is correctly implemented.
The addition of the reasons array to track module dependencies aligns with the PR objectives.
packages/utils/__fixtures__/webpack-stats-1.js (1)
191-204: Verify if duplicate reasons from the same module are expected.
I notice there are two reason entries from the same module (package-a) with different userLoc values. While this might be intentional if the same module imports the dependency from multiple locations, it's worth verifying if this is the expected behavior or if reasons should be deduplicated by module.
Let's check how webpack handles multiple imports from the same module:
✅ Verification successful
Duplicate reasons are expected, but they are intentionally deduplicated during processing
Looking at the codebase, specifically in packages/plugin-webpack-filter/src/index.ts, there's clear evidence that webpack intentionally creates multiple reason entries for the same module - one for the import and one for each reference. The code explicitly handles this by deduplicating reasons:
// webpack adds one entry for import and one entry for every reference
if (reason.module && !reasonsByModule[reason.module]) {
reasonsByModule[reason.module] = { module: reason.module };
}The comment in the source code directly acknowledges this behavior as expected. The test fixture is correctly representing webpack's raw output format, while the processing code handles the deduplication when needed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other test fixtures or source code that handles multiple reasons from the same module
rg -l "reasons.*moduleIdentifier.*module.*userLoc" --type js --type ts
Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for webpack stats fixtures and test files to understand the expected structure
fd -e js -e ts webpack.*stats
# Then examine the content of any found files to see patterns of reasons handling
rg -A 5 "reasons.*:" --type js --type ts
Length of output: 5722
packages/ui/src/components/module-info/module-info.tsx (2)
7-8: LGTM: New imports are correctly placed and used.
The new constants COMPONENT and SECTIONS are appropriately imported from @bundle-stats/utils and are used effectively in the new reasons section.
309-333: Implementation successfully meets PR objectives.
The new reasons section effectively fulfills the PR objective of displaying module reasons by:
- Clearly presenting the list of dependent modules
- Providing easy navigation to each dependent module
- Seamlessly integrating with the existing module information panel
Let's verify that the module reasons are being correctly passed through from webpack:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the module reasons implementation to ensure it's being handled correctly throughout the pipeline.
Let me check one more aspect to verify the complete flow of module reasons from extraction to display.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final verification response:
Implementation correctly handles module reasons throughout the pipeline
The verification confirms that:
- Module reasons are properly extracted from webpack stats in
packages/utils/src/webpack/extract/modules.ts - The type system correctly defines reasons in
packages/plugin-webpack-filter/src/index.tswithWebpackStatsFilteredModuleinterface - The UI component in
module-info.tsxcorrectly renders the extracted reasons with proper navigation
The implementation not only meets the PR objectives but is also properly integrated across the data extraction, type system, and UI layers, ensuring type safety and correct data flow from webpack stats to the final UI rendering.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that module reasons are being correctly extracted and passed through
# Test: Search for module reasons extraction in webpack plugin
ast-grep --pattern 'reasons = $$$'
# Test: Search for module reasons usage in components
rg -A 2 'reasons\?\.map'
Length of output: 322
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the complete module extraction logic
rg -A 10 "moduleEntry.reasons"
# Check how module reasons are structured in the data model
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ = {
$$$
reasons?: $_
$$$
}'
# Check for any tests related to module reasons
rg -l "reasons.*test"
Length of output: 927
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the module type definitions and interfaces
rg -A 5 "interface.*Module"
rg -A 5 "type.*Module"
# Check for any webpack stats processing related to reasons
rg -A 5 "processWebpackStats"
# Look for the component props type definition
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $Props {
$$$
item?: $_
$$$
}'
Length of output: 11758
packages/utils/src/utils/component-links.ts (2)
260-274: LGTM! The new function follows established patterns.
The implementation of getBundleModulesEntry is well-structured and consistent with the codebase's patterns:
- Follows the same ComponentLink structure as other functions
- Uses appropriate parameter types and defaults
- Aligns with the PR's objective of supporting module reasons display
260-274: Verify the translation key and constant usage.
Let's ensure the integration is complete:
- Verify the translation key exists
- Check the constant usage in the routing system
✅ Verification successful
Integration is properly implemented and consistent
The verification confirms that:
- The translation key
COMPONENT_LINK_MODULEexists ini18n.jswith the correct message "View module information" COMPONENT.BUNDLE_MODULESis properly defined and consistently used across the codebaseSECTIONS.MODULESis correctly used in multiple component link functions following the same pattern- The function follows the same structure as other similar component link functions in the file
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the translation key and constant usage
# Test 1: Check if the translation key exists
rg "COMPONENT_LINK_MODULE.*=" -A 2
# Test 2: Check usage of COMPONENT.BUNDLE_MODULES in routing
rg "COMPONENT\.BUNDLE_MODULES.*=" -A 2
Length of output: 444
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify with a broader search to find related constants and their usage
# Check for COMPONENT_LINK_MODULE (without the 'S' suffix) in i18n
rg "COMPONENT_LINK_MODULE[^S]" -A 2
# Search for BUNDLE_MODULES usage in a broader context
rg "BUNDLE_MODULES" -A 2
# Check the SECTIONS.MODULES constant definition and usage
rg "SECTIONS.*MODULES" -A 2
# Look for similar component link functions for patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'export const get$_Entry = ($$$) => ({
section: SECTIONS.$_,
$$$
})'
Length of output: 7332
| reasons: [ | ||
| { | ||
| module: 'node_modules/package-a/index.js', | ||
| }, | ||
| ], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Fixture needs additional test cases for module reasons
Looking at the webpack stats fixtures, the test coverage for module reasons should be enhanced:
- Only one module (
package-c) in webpack-stats-1 has reasons defined, while other modules lack this information - The existing reason only shows basic module reference, while webpack stats can include additional metadata like:
- moduleId
- moduleIdentifier
- userLoc (usage location)
- Multiple reasons scenario is only shown in the non-extracted fixture but missing in the extracted version
The fixture should be updated to:
- Add reasons to more modules to test different dependency relationships
- Include complete reason metadata (ids, locations)
- Preserve multiple reasons case in extracted version
- Cover both direct and transitive dependencies
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify fixture completeness.
Please verify if this fixture adequately covers all module reason scenarios we need to test:
- Should other modules in the fixture also have reasons?
- Should we add test cases for modules with multiple reasons?
Let's check webpack's actual output structure for module reasons:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other test fixtures that might contain webpack stats
# to compare the structure of module reasons
fd -e js -e json . -E node_modules | xargs rg -l "reasons.*module"
Length of output: 68
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find webpack stats fixtures and their structure
# First, let's look for files with "webpack-stats" in their name
fd "webpack-stats" --type f
# Then let's examine the content of any test files that might be using these fixtures
fd "webpack" --type f -e test.js -e spec.js
Length of output: 776
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of webpack stats fixtures to understand the structure of module reasons
cat packages/utils/__fixtures__/webpack-stats-1.js packages/utils/__fixtures__/webpack-stats-2.js packages/utils/__fixtures__/webpack-stats-3.js
# Also check the extracted versions
cat packages/utils/__fixtures__/webpack-stats-1.extracted.js packages/utils/__fixtures__/webpack-stats-2.extracted.js packages/utils/__fixtures__/webpack-stats-3.extracted.js
Length of output: 19093
| modules: optional( | ||
| array( | ||
| type({ | ||
| name: string(), | ||
| size: number(), | ||
| reasons: optional(array(WebpackSourceModuleReasonStruct)), | ||
| }), | ||
| ), | ||
| ), | ||
| reasons: optional(array(WebpackSourceModuleReasonStruct)), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Schema changes are safe, but components need updates to handle nested reasons
The verification revealed that while the schema changes are correct, there are components that need to be updated to handle the new nested reasons structure:
packages/utils/src/webpack/extract/modules.tscurrently only processes top-level reasons and needs to be updated to handle nested module reasonspackages/ui/src/components/module-info/module-info.tsxdisplays reasons but may need updates to show both top-level and nested module reasonspackages/plugin-webpack-filter/src/index.tsprocesses reasons but might need adjustments for the nested structure
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify schema usage in consuming components.
The updated schema correctly captures both top-level and nested module reasons, aligning well with webpack's output format. The structure will support the PR's objective of extracting and displaying module reasons.
Let's verify that components consuming this schema are properly handling both levels of reasons:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for components that might need updates to handle the new reason fields
# Look for files importing or referencing WebpackSourceModuleStruct
rg -l "WebpackSourceModuleStruct" --type ts
# Look for existing reason-related rendering logic that might need updates
rg -i "reasons?" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 159
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search strategy
# 1. Search for any files that import from schemas.ts
rg -l "from ['\"].*schemas['\"]" --type ts
# 2. Look for reason-related logic with proper file type
rg -i "reasons?" --type ts
# 3. Look for webpack module-related components/logic
rg -l "WebpackSource|webpack.*module" --type ts
# 4. Check the actual schema usage
ast-grep --pattern 'WebpackSourceModuleStruct'
Length of output: 4350
| // skip modules that are orphane(do not belong to any chunk) | ||
| if (!chunks || chunks?.length === 0) { | ||
| return; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove duplicate check and fix syntax.
This orphan module check is redundant as it's already performed at lines 26-29. Additionally:
- The comment has a typo ("orphane" should be "orphan")
- The optional chaining in
chunks?.lengthis redundant sincechunksis already null-checked
- // skip modules that are orphane(do not belong to any chunk)
- if (!chunks || chunks?.length === 0) {
- return;
- }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // skip modules that are orphane(do not belong to any chunk) | |
| if (!chunks || chunks?.length === 0) { | |
| return; | |
| } |
resolves: #1449
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
ModuleInfocomponent to display reasons for module inclusion.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Style