fix: upgrade to hast-util-to-mdast 9.x

[tripodsan]

BREAKING CHANGE: Depends on [email protected]

Initial checklist

• I read the support docs
• I read the contributing guide
• I agree to follow the code of conduct
• I searched issues and couldn’t find anything (or linked relevant results below)
• If applicable, I’ve added docs and tests

Description of changes

Upgrade to hast-util-to-mdast 9.x

@wooorm I don't understand the tests and the types enough to fix the tests.... any hints ?

[wooorm]

Hey hey! Thank you!!

TS 4.9 changed a lot of stuff unfortunately. That’s why it all errors. Not very hard to fix when you know how it works!

As you noticed, I’m taking time to upgrade everything in the ecosystem. Most of it is pretty small. But there will be several breaking changes, including from micromark. To ease migration, I want to batch the majors in a relatively short time span. And before that moment is there, it’ll require about a month or so of work on micromark.

For now, if you really want to upgrade, I’d recommend a tiny fork for now:

function (options) {
    return (hast) {
        return toMdast(hast, options)
    }
}

Also taking this moment, as you’re heavily using the ecosystem, to ask whether you have requests for some breaking changes that should go somewhere!

[tripodsan]

thanks for the reply. I understand.

Also taking this moment, as you’re heavily using the ecosystem, to ask whether you have requests for some breaking changes that should go somewhere!

not at the moment, I think :-)

[wooorm]

done! https://github.com/rehypejs/rehype-remark/releases/tag/10.0.0