You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that with the 300->200Mhz change the vcore voltage was kept at maximum with 1.30V.
AFAIK a moderate 200Mhz overclocking does not require overvolting and it might be worthwhile to reduce this to 1.1V stock or maybe 1.15V to have some margin.
This might add some stability for certain installations as it reduces the power consumption and its variability and could increase operational reliability for boarderline rp2040 cores. But your milage might vary.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I just tested 1.15V on v2.80 with an OLED and a Mariko together with an rp2040-tiny as a board autodetect test and so far no issues booting up just fine.
I noticed that with the 300->200Mhz change the vcore voltage was kept at maximum with 1.30V.
AFAIK a moderate 200Mhz overclocking does not require overvolting and it might be worthwhile to reduce this to 1.1V stock or maybe 1.15V to have some margin.
This might add some stability for certain installations as it reduces the power consumption and its variability and could increase operational reliability for boarderline rp2040 cores. But your milage might vary.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: