-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 758
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🎉NEW anti-anti-adblock project - this one is inactive #4637
Comments
I don't see a point, because uBlock Origin and AdGuard ad-blockers already have their own anti-adblock built-in filter lists, where anti-adblock messages can be reported and will be blocked by filter list maintentainers:
Also there already exists an additional anti-adblock filter list: https://github.com/bogachenko/fuckfuckadblock |
I know, I've been contributing to uBO and AdGuard extensively for a few years. But there still are different approaches that could be taken when dealing with a smaller number of users - megaup & uBlock Origin volunteers playing a cat-and-mouse anti-adblock game, whereas @@||megaup.net^$ehide would work fine for personal use |
Ok, but I wonder why to reinvent the wheel from scratch (means: why to create your list from scratch) ? Why not just to fork bogachenko's list and remove all controversial |
most of the entries are for AdBlock, and disregarded by uBO |
I'm speaking about version for uBlock https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AdCrunchSoftware/AdblockingFilters/main/foruBO.txt |
uBlock Origin already does an excellent job at blocking ads and addressing anti-adblock, so there isn't much to add |
So why bogachenko's list has over 22000 filters, do you mean his list is obsolete now in uBlock? |
Yes, mostly. It's banned by uBO anyway. Edit: I guess a better description of the opinion would be "mostly obsolete" |
@SeamlessRelaxation Yep, the Frenchman loves monopoly. Many of the rules that worked wrong were found by the uBlock Origin team, but were not reported to me. It got to the point that any mention on Reddit by a user about my list was punished, in the best case, by deleting the comment, in the worst case, by a ban. While I was trying to eliminate all the false positives found in the uBlock Origin sheet and reported it to the Japanese-guy -
@garry-ut99 At the moment I am busy in real life, but I still try to maintain my project, 80 percent of the rules still work correctly, by the way, I recently created tools to maintain this list, I will improve them as much as possible. Have a nice day. |
@bogachenko I suppose an easy "fix" could be to disable the filters that generically allow google stuff for uBO users - they don't help uBO users that much either way and for ima3.js there's the !#if !ext_ublock
!#endif Have a nice day as well! |
Unrelated to what I am speaking about: #4637 (comment), you've again misunderstood the context of my question, I proposed you to fork his list and remove or disable filters which were a reason of the ban. |
bro can you give me the "foruBO.txt" file |
i tried to wonder your own issues repo, but it was 404 instead |
Same as the user above, can't find the repo. I switched from the adguard android app to the DNS because the app was so performance heavy. Having an anti-adblock userscript would be immensely helpful |
Yes.... Not getting that repo |
Hello!
I've started a new project, it's called AdCrunch.
For those interested in using AdBlock / Adblock Plus with a better user experience: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AdCrunchSoftware/AdblockingFilters/main/antiantiadblock.txt
If you're using uBlock Origin: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AdCrunchSoftware/AdblockingFilters/main/foruBO.txt
Please report anti-adblock issues here: https://github.com/AdCrunchSoftware/AdblockingFilters/issues
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: