Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider renaming BM to MNO #441

Closed
akrzos opened this issue Feb 20, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Consider renaming BM to MNO #441

akrzos opened this issue Feb 20, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@akrzos
Copy link
Member

akrzos commented Feb 20, 2024

Instead of referring to standard (3 control-plane, X worker nodes) and compact clusters as "Bare Metal" we should rename the terminology to MNO or Multi-Node OpenShift. This makes it simpler to understand since the two deployment playbooks with be MNO and SNO or Multi-Node OpenShift and Single Node OpenShift. Thus we should rename the bm-deploy playbook to mno-deploy. Considering this change will affect many folks, this needs to be communicated well before it is merged.

@josecastillolema
Copy link
Collaborator

@akrzos may we close this as complete?

@radez
Copy link
Collaborator

radez commented Nov 14, 2024

Yes, this has been completed.
#559

@radez radez closed this as completed Nov 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants