You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Polars supports group_by_dynamic that does (approximately) grouped rolling windows.
We do not currently support this in cudf-polars, what is more, the IR doesn't distinguish between normal groupbys and dynamic groupbys when we get it from polars. Consequently, we only fall back to CPU based on some heuristics, and sometimes just do the wrong thing.
@wence- is there urgency to get this actually implemented, or are we OK with fallback for 24.12 (now that pola-rs/polars#19385 is out) while we work on higher priority tasks like inequality joins?
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Polars supports
group_by_dynamic
that does (approximately) grouped rolling windows.We do not currently support this in cudf-polars, what is more, the IR doesn't distinguish between normal groupbys and dynamic groupbys when we get it from polars. Consequently, we only fall back to CPU based on some heuristics, and sometimes just do the wrong thing.
Describe the solution you'd like
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: