Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support running inside both headless Dynamo and UI mode #24

Open
1 of 2 tasks
radumg opened this issue Jan 8, 2019 · 1 comment
Open
1 of 2 tasks

support running inside both headless Dynamo and UI mode #24

radumg opened this issue Jan 8, 2019 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@radumg
Copy link
Owner

radumg commented Jan 8, 2019

Situation right now

Extension has most of the functionality in the ViewExtension

What new feature do you suggest ?

  • Split functionality between Extension & ViewExtension
  • use DynamoModel wherever possible instead of DynamoViewModel
  • support using both and selectively enabling endpoints based on available Dynamo features

How would this feature improve it ?

Allow some features of DynaServer to work in a headless, cross-platform version of Dynamo too.

Are you ready to help build this feature ?

  • Yes
  • No
@radumg radumg added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 8, 2019
@radumg radumg self-assigned this Jan 8, 2019
@radumg radumg pinned this issue Jan 12, 2019
@radumg radumg changed the title switch to using DynamoModel instead of DynamoViewModel support running inside both headless Dynamo and UI mode Jan 13, 2019
@radumg radumg added this to the 1.0 milestone Jan 13, 2019
@radumg radumg unpinned this issue Jan 26, 2019
@radumg
Copy link
Owner Author

radumg commented Jan 30, 2019

tried abstracting away commands in a ServerExtension but running into thread safety issues. Needs further investigation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant