Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add to debug logs for cloud functional test workflow #7892

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2024

Conversation

lakshmimsft
Copy link
Contributor

Description

There have been some unexpected failed runs for the cloud-functional-tests #7782.
Earlier PR #7885 added debug logs which have given some useful data.
This PR adds to these debug logs to help debug further.

Type of change

Fixes: Gets more data for #7782

@radius-functional-tests
Copy link

radius-functional-tests bot commented Sep 6, 2024

Radius functional test overview

🔍 Go to test action run

Name Value
Repository lakshmimsft/radius-mainfork
Commit ref 3e27d66
Unique ID func9224c413b3
Image tag pr-func9224c413b3
Click here to see the list of tools in the current test run
  • gotestsum 1.12.0
  • KinD: v0.20.0
  • Dapr: 1.12.0
  • Azure KeyVault CSI driver: 1.4.2
  • Azure Workload identity webhook: 1.3.0
  • Bicep recipe location ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/test/testrecipes/test-bicep-recipes/<name>:pr-func9224c413b3
  • Terraform recipe location http://tf-module-server.radius-test-tf-module-server.svc.cluster.local/<name>.zip (in cluster)
  • applications-rp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/applications-rp:pr-func9224c413b3
  • controller test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/controller:pr-func9224c413b3
  • ucp test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/dev/ucpd:pr-func9224c413b3
  • deployment-engine test image location: ghcr.io/radius-project/deployment-engine:latest

Test Status

⌛ Building Radius and pushing container images for functional tests...
✅ Container images build succeeded
⌛ Publishing Bicep Recipes for functional tests...
✅ Recipe publishing succeeded
⌛ Starting ucp-cloud functional tests...
⌛ Starting corerp-cloud functional tests...
⌛ Starting datastoresrp-cloud functional tests...
✅ ucp-cloud functional tests succeeded
✅ datastoresrp-cloud functional tests succeeded
✅ corerp-cloud functional tests succeeded

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 61.20%. Comparing base (dd81399) to head (3e27d66).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7892      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   61.18%   61.20%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         523      523              
  Lines       27683    27683              
==========================================
+ Hits        16938    16942       +4     
+ Misses       9252     9250       -2     
+ Partials     1493     1491       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ytimocin ytimocin merged commit cce1fe6 into radius-project:main Sep 6, 2024
28 checks passed
ytimocin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2024
# Description

Ref: #7892
Based on logs seen for errors in the past week,
eg.
https://github.com/radius-project/radius/actions/runs/10753879482/job/29823820614

Adding condition to workflow to run when
github.event.workflow_run.conclusion == 'success' when event is
workflow_run.
Keeping additional debug logs in place for the next few days to monitor
any subsequent failures.
Another PR to remove logs will be sent closer to end of this week if no
failures are detected.

## Type of change

- This pull request is a minor refactor, code cleanup, test improvement,
or other maintenance task and doesn't change the functionality of Radius
(#7782).

Fixes: #7782
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants