You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The goal here is move the special types and checks we have in place and instead use the astropy based stokes values. The will work for the polarization cases that are defined in astropy stokes WCS. The remaining cases we can define using the custom declaration for stokes that is built into astropy.
I am working on this and want to have it ready so we can code review in person @keflavich
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
preshanth
changed the title
Moving stokes spectralcube to be inline with astropy stokes WCS.
Moving stokes spectralcube to be compatible with astropy stokes WCS.
Apr 23, 2024
________________________________
From: Adam Ginsburg ***@***.***>
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2024 6:01:23 AM
To: radio-astro-tools/spectral-cube ***@***.***>
Cc: Preshanth Jagannathan ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [radio-astro-tools/spectral-cube] Moving stokes spectralcube to be compatible with astropy stokes WCS. (Issue #905) {External}
could you get the PR submitted before I'm out there?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#905 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AARIMUMEXLGNCJ5KOEMXLS3Y6ZERHAVCNFSM6AAAAABGT56O36VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDANZSGEZDANRWGI>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
[ { ***@***.***": "http://schema.org", ***@***.***": "EmailMessage", "potentialAction": { ***@***.***": "ViewAction", "target": "#905 (comment)", "url": "#905 (comment)", "name": "View Issue" }, "description": "View this Issue on GitHub", "publisher": { ***@***.***": "Organization", "name": "GitHub", "url": "https://github.com" } } ]
The goal here is move the special types and checks we have in place and instead use the astropy based stokes values. The will work for the polarization cases that are defined in astropy stokes WCS. The remaining cases we can define using the custom declaration for stokes that is built into astropy.
I am working on this and want to have it ready so we can code review in person @keflavich
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: