Adding plurals of unit representation strings #487
Replies: 4 comments
-
Seems unnecessary as it is only a lexical distinction and doesn’t change the representation. We should avoid this kind of change unless you plan to use skos:altLabel. Even then I wonder at the value.
Jack Hodges, Ph.D.
Arbor Studios
… On Apr 11, 2022, at 7:55 AM, Stuart Chalk ***@***.***> wrote:
I am going to add unit representations for UDUNITS encoding system. In addition to having multiple 'legal' strings for some units, e.g. tablespoons (Tbl, Tbsp, tbsp, Tblsp, tblsp), UDUNITS supports plurals of its unit strings. Any issue with adding plurals?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I strongly agree that there should be only a single URI for each unit (I don't think you were suggesting more, right?) and I also agree that leading people down the path of many possible labels in general just raises interoperability issues ("I couldn't find label xyz!"). Would it not be preferable for people to recognize the general practice of sticking with singular names? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This makes good sense. Thanks. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I am going to add unit representations for UDUNITS encoding system. In addition to having multiple 'legal' strings for some units, e.g. tablespoons (Tbl, Tbsp, tbsp, Tblsp, tblsp), UDUNITS supports plurals of its unit strings. Any issue with adding plurals?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions