You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From a technical perpsective, is there a specific reason why smp is not implementing unet with padding "same" to ensure applicability to different image sizes? as I understand it, this will not have an effect on already "correctly" sized images and it will enable variable image size. Is that correct?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
One more solution might be to change the interpolation from scale factor to target size. Historically, there was an issue converting model to ONNX with size specified instead of scale factor, but I suppose it's no longer an issue.
In case you would like to contribute, I would appreciate a help on this feature!
This should be split into two separate PRs to avoid regression
add test for output equivalence (I can add it shortly)
change interpolation/add padding, both could be added
Hi All,
From a technical perpsective, is there a specific reason why smp is not implementing unet with padding "same" to ensure applicability to different image sizes? as I understand it, this will not have an effect on already "correctly" sized images and it will enable variable image size. Is that correct?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: