Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
That's not really a constructive wording ... What do you mean by "comprehensive"? What is missing exactly and that is not tracked in a GitHub issue? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Indeed, the wording could be more constructive. Please excuse my frustration (which is humongous at this point). Since I am new to markup and Quatro, coming from a Python background, I have the impression that the documentation is incomplete or patchy and assumes a lot of implicit knowledge from all the resources that are referenced by the docs. From digging through some discussions online, however, it appears to me that I am the only one having trouble to get a grip on this system. Anyways, comprehensive in this context would mean, for instance, that I would find valid options of document classes right beside the That said, let me reformulate my question: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Description
Which are actually useful and comprehensive, unlike the "guidance" and "reference" on quarto.org?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions