Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider implementing Knuth-Bendix Completion #21

Open
brandonwillard opened this issue Apr 12, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Consider implementing Knuth-Bendix Completion #21

brandonwillard opened this issue Apr 12, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@brandonwillard
Copy link
Member

brandonwillard commented Apr 12, 2020

While this might not be completely appropriate for a strictly unification-themed library, it doesn't seem completely out of place to provide Knuth-Bendix-like completion and/or elements thereof (e.g. term orderings). We're already doing some similar things here, and unification is a key element in the completion process.

Perhaps this is more appropriate for etuples, or an extension of facts in kanren.

@brandonwillard brandonwillard added enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested labels Apr 12, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant