You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When using pytest --cov together with a FastAPI app, sqlalchemy (async Postgres connection) and pytest-docker (for the DB) we get back wrongly calculated coverage for the services. For organization purposes we separate our functionality into routers and services where the routers import and use the services.
Expected vs actual result
While the coverage in our router functions seems to be right the coverage in our service functions is not large enough i.e. some lines which are definitely covered are marked as uncovered.
We already tested the following possible fixes:
eager loading of the pytest-cov plugin via -p
explicitly setting the coverage sources in the command via --cov=...
Just clone the repo, run poetry install and then poetry run scripts/coverage.sh and observe the results.
The asset_service.py file should have a higher coverage value. One example would be lines 39-41 which are reported as uncovered but are definitely called in the test test_get_asset_not_found inside the file tests/api/test_03_asset.py.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Paying this forward, I took a trip through multiple github issues/repos and finally found nedbat/coveragepy#841 (comment) which fixed coverage for projects that used async sqlalchemy. Adding:
[tool.coverage.run]
concurrency = ["greenlet"]
to my pyproject.toml did the trick.
This was also the fix for nedbat/coveragepy#1216, which is a similar instance of a few libraries interacting in unexpected ways to break coverage. I hope this helps people find this fix in the future!
Summary
When using pytest --cov together with a FastAPI app, sqlalchemy (async Postgres connection) and pytest-docker (for the DB) we get back wrongly calculated coverage for the services. For organization purposes we separate our functionality into routers and services where the routers import and use the services.
Expected vs actual result
While the coverage in our router functions seems to be right the coverage in our service functions is not large enough i.e. some lines which are definitely covered are marked as uncovered.
We already tested the following possible fixes:
-p
--cov=...
__init__.py
in all subdirectoriesReproducer
Versions
Python: 3.11.2
pytest: 7.3.1
Config
pyproject.toml:
Code
Repo: https://github.com/t-pohl/pytest-coverage-err
Just clone the repo, run
poetry install
and thenpoetry run scripts/coverage.sh
and observe the results.The
asset_service.py
file should have a higher coverage value. One example would be lines 39-41 which are reported as uncovered but are definitely called in the testtest_get_asset_not_found
inside the filetests/api/test_03_asset.py
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: