Changes to docs fomatting

[MrRedstone058]

The Issue:

Currently, there is a disparity between the oncoming experimental Circle documentation and the old Rect/Surface/math documentation as shown below.

Geometry docs

Rect docs

Surface docs

Math docs

As shown above, the current Circle docs have an updated style where attributes and methods subsection as well as using the new mathematic formatting system. However, it is not the same for other older modules and classes.

The Aim:

Discuss the best layout and rewrite the documentation in the new layout (preferably the circle documentation) to achieve consistency and parity.

Feedback is very much wanted.

[itzpr3d4t0r]

Yes geometry is a bit unconventional, but this isn't a problem limited to geometry alone as you noted. The real issue is we don't have a standard for docs formatting and docs structure/layout, so many issues arise.

[MrRedstone058]

perhaps we can agree on something? this issue is open for ideas anyway