We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Provided conventions use the following context short-hands:
tby-ds1/files.ctx.jsonld: "obo": "https://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/", tby-sd1/authors.ctx.jsonld: "obo": "https://purl.obolibrary.org/", tby-sd1/dataset.ctx.jsonld: "obo": "https://purl.obolibrary.org/",
And with how they are used:
tby-ds1/files.ctx.jsonld: "checksum[md5]": "obo:NCIT_C171276", tby-sd1/authors.ctx.jsonld: "orcid": "obo:IAO_0000708"
I'd say only the ds1 is correct -- the IRIs resolve to http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCIT_C171276 and https://purl.obolibrary.org/IAO_0000708 respectively. The latter redirects to OBOFoundry's GitHub page instead of ontobee; the correct IRI for ORCID identifier is http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000708.
ds1
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Provided conventions use the following context short-hands:
And with how they are used:
I'd say only the
ds1
is correct -- the IRIs resolve to http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCIT_C171276 and https://purl.obolibrary.org/IAO_0000708 respectively. The latter redirects to OBOFoundry's GitHub page instead of ontobee; the correct IRI for ORCID identifier is http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000708.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: