You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Apologies. This is a question I emailed to you, but it maybe of use to other users if posted here
I would be interested in generating simplitigs from fastq files. This raises a few questions:
1/ As ProPhasm does not accept fastq files would it be suitable to convert the reads directly to fasta or to k-mers before passing to ProPhasm?
2/ There are many potential sources of error/noise in raw reads so would you recommend pre-processing K-mers (filtering/correcting) before passing to ProPhasm?
3/ Would native frequency filtering be something you would consider instituting in the software?
4/ A K-mer size of 32 bp is the maximum allowed for the '-k' option. Could this be relaxed to allow for assembly with larger K-mers and how might this be achieved?
Thanks for your help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Apologies. This is a question I emailed to you, but it maybe of use to other users if posted here
I would be interested in generating simplitigs from fastq files. This raises a few questions:
1/ As ProPhasm does not accept fastq files would it be suitable to convert the reads directly to fasta or to k-mers before passing to ProPhasm?
2/ There are many potential sources of error/noise in raw reads so would you recommend pre-processing K-mers (filtering/correcting) before passing to ProPhasm?
3/ Would native frequency filtering be something you would consider instituting in the software?
4/ A K-mer size of 32 bp is the maximum allowed for the '-k' option. Could this be relaxed to allow for assembly with larger K-mers and how might this be achieved?
Thanks for your help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: