Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use doMock({virtual: true}) instead of moduleMappers #23

Open
jukben opened this issue Aug 5, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Use doMock({virtual: true}) instead of moduleMappers #23

jukben opened this issue Aug 5, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@jukben
Copy link
Contributor

jukben commented Aug 5, 2019

We can probably remove fixtures and the moduleMapper (living in Jest config) to "emulate" different configuration scenarios. Virtual doMock should work specifically for this case!
@jukben jukben changed the title Use doMock({virtual: true}) instead of moduleMappers Use doMock({virtual: true}) instead of moduleMappers Aug 5, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jukben