You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi @lahavlipson , have you tried training DPVO on other datasets beside TartanAir? I tried to train it on TUM (using _build_dataset from raw RGB and depth maps), but all values became NAN, do you know the issue? (t1[0] and t2[0] are all NANs). Thank you so much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, dear authors, it turns out that the nomalization step will cause NANs in poses
After I delete the two lines of codes like I did in the picture, the issue disappeared. Do you think that simply deleting the codes is available? Or are there any other ways to solve this issue? THANKS!
@markinruc Well, for the NAN in the image it was because some values in my depth maps are 0, and the inverse depth calculation results in NAN (1/0). Another NAN in inference is that my model was so bad....After I trained it for some epochs the NAN disappeared
Hi @lahavlipson , have you tried training DPVO on other datasets beside TartanAir? I tried to train it on TUM (using _build_dataset from raw RGB and depth maps), but all values became NAN, do you know the issue? (t1[0] and t2[0] are all NANs). Thank you so much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: