-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Idea for an FSI example: Write an adapter for WaterLily.jl #11
Comments
After a quick first look: It seems the code uses a fixed Cartesian mesh. If moving boundaries are done similarly as in the "CFD-Lab code", FSI with preCICE will be complicated to do. |
https://github.com/trixi-framework/Trixi.jl has some nice solvers and examples for PDEs with conservation laws. WaterLily.jl is not a conventional solver per se. It is a data generation package for Deep Learning models. And the way they approximate the vector field is really dubious. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsPkfZqbNSQ , for an intro into the WaterLilly.jl package. |
@marinlauber Definitely. We currently have no Julia-based solver in our tutorials. Anything there to continuously test the Julia bindings could be very helpful. |
@uekerman Sounds good! I already have the preCICE coupling working for WaterLily, but for a simple IGA solver. Together with @hverhelst we are actually looking at binding WaterLily.jl and G+Smo to preCICE and running some example cases. |
WaterLily.jl seems to be a very easy to use flow solver in Julia: https://julialang.org/blog/2021/08/sharks/
Writing an adapter for this would give us a first tutorial case where we could demonstrate the Julia bindings.
(I have no idea if there are more mature flow solvers in Julia, I just discovered this and it looks easy and interesting.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: