Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Looks to be similar to #353. While it's likely simple to implement, it grows the API surface area and creates multiple ways of setting a new signal value, which isn't really ideal. That being said, we do expose the Signal class so you can patch your |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi everyone.
I know this is an issue with Proxies and not signals specifically, but having to do:
is not favourable.
I understand the why, however, I don't see why something like
Signal.update()
couldn't be implemented.If this is silly, I apologise, I haven't looked at the source for
signals-core
just yet, but I would assume this is pretty simple to do.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions