From 483a286ba52342dce3eb595e5ddd43fb539c7190 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hsiao-Wei Wang Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 23:57:21 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Remove `assert len(missing_cell_indices) != 0` check --- specs/_features/eip7594/polynomial-commitments-sampling.md | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/specs/_features/eip7594/polynomial-commitments-sampling.md b/specs/_features/eip7594/polynomial-commitments-sampling.md index 9337a912e0..7be1a4a059 100644 --- a/specs/_features/eip7594/polynomial-commitments-sampling.md +++ b/specs/_features/eip7594/polynomial-commitments-sampling.md @@ -565,9 +565,6 @@ def construct_vanishing_polynomial(missing_cell_indices: Sequence[CellIndex]) -> We never encounter this case however because this method is used solely for recovery and recovery only works if at least half of the cells are available. """ - - assert len(missing_cell_indices) != 0 - # Get the small domain roots_of_unity_reduced = compute_roots_of_unity(CELLS_PER_EXT_BLOB)