Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate converting to using the AST tree entirely, or at least partially #13

Open
portante opened this issue Oct 1, 2012 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@portante
Copy link
Owner

portante commented Oct 1, 2012

Using the AST tree might simplify the code (removing all kinds of pattern matching we do today on the CST tree) and allow additional features not possible with the CST tree.

It might also speed up the processing of source files (or not).

This is a place holder for tracking the pros and cons of making that switch. It should be noted that such a switch should have a significant enough benefit to out weigh any destabilization of the code in the mean time.

See also Issue #12.

@ghost ghost assigned portante Oct 1, 2012
@portante
Copy link
Owner Author

Might want to check out logilab-astng (http://www.logilab.org/856) for this as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant