Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Forcestack entity amount message incorrect (low priority) #262

Open
andrewkm opened this issue Sep 16, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Forcestack entity amount message incorrect (low priority) #262

andrewkm opened this issue Sep 16, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@andrewkm
Copy link

Paper 1.19.2 Build 142
StackMob-5 built upon: e5b74af (latest)

I have no idea how to explain this (sorry for typing up this bug report in a rush) but like, the msg in chat/console isn't correct, check this out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgdSbhSdP2Y

@andrewkm
Copy link
Author

Updated video:
https://youtu.be/GK8OQiB3OOI

@andrewkm
Copy link
Author

andrewkm commented Jun 13, 2024

Updated video https://youtu.be/vQuSiFNc3O0
Tested against 7e2dd33 & dmulloy2/ProtocolLib@389233f

@Nathat23 can we maybe, perhaps, possible, hopefully, lol, check this out finally xD
Not sure if you're getting these notifications tbh, perhaps I should make a new issue.

@ploppyperson
Copy link
Owner

Just checking... so if you used /spawnmob and waited they don't stack? It's only after '/sm forcestack' is ran that they stack.

@andrewkm
Copy link
Author

andrewkm commented Jun 13, 2024

Just checking... so if you used /spawnmob and waited they don't stack? It's only after '/sm forcestack' is ran that they stack.

If I use /spawnmob and wait they correctly stack no problem.
sm forcestack doesn't stack anything as you can see in the video. It's literally a broken command.

My stacking is set to 5...
However if I spawn 4, I'd obviously like /sm forcestack, to force a stack.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants