Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-structure Leisure category #34

Open
plepe opened this issue Mar 11, 2019 · 9 comments
Open

Re-structure Leisure category #34

plepe opened this issue Mar 11, 2019 · 9 comments

Comments

@plepe
Copy link
Owner

plepe commented Mar 11, 2019

I think that there are too many and too diverse map features in the leisure category. I think, it's rather useless. I would like to split it into several sub-categories. I would like to have your input (@Cybereric @IgorEliezer @severinmenard @debyos @waldyrious and others who are interested) on this.

On this page, I listed the most common values and where (beside the current 'leisure' category) they are being queried right now (bold). Feel free to make suggestions in the "category" column, to which sub-categories you would add them to (and how to name them). You do have edit rights in the wiki, don't you?

@waldyrious
Copy link
Contributor

I can see the edit button in the wiki, yes, so I assume others will too. However, I'm very short on time for the next few weeks, so I won't be able to provide much input on this, sorry.

@plepe
Copy link
Owner Author

plepe commented Aug 27, 2019

@Hufkratzer maybe you are also interested.

I'm really not happy with the current "Leisure, Sport & Shopping" parent category and like to re-structure it into two top categories:

  • Gastronomy and Shopping (Ideas for a better name?)
    • Gastronomy
    • Shopping
    • Craft
  • Leisure, Sport and Outdoor (or only "Leisure"?)
    • Children amenities
    • Swimming and bathing
    • Mountain bike routes
    • Climbing
    • All Leisure (currently "Leisure")
    • All Sports (currently "Sport")
    • Hiking routes (currently under Transport -> Walking)

What do you think? Any better naming ideas?

@plepe
Copy link
Owner Author

plepe commented Aug 27, 2019

You can try this here: https://www.openstreetbrowser.org/#repo=openstreetbrowser/main~leisure-restruct

@IgorEliezer
Copy link
Contributor

IgorEliezer commented Aug 27, 2019

Leisure, Sport and Outdoor (or only "Leisure"?)

Or just "Leisure and Sport", as the Outdoor idea somewhat overlaps Tourism and Leisure... well Outdoor overlaps everything. :P

We need to avoid long titles since they will be translated.

@Hufkratzer
Copy link
Contributor

We need to avoid long titles since they will be translated.

+1

Leisure, Sport and Outdoor (or only "Leisure"?)

Or just "Leisure and Sport", as the Outdoor idea somewhat overlaps Tourism and Leisure... well Outdoor overlaps everything. :P

Leisure includes Sport -> "Leisure" is sufficient

Not sure if "Children amenities" fits into "Leisure"; playgrounds are ok, but shops and toilets? Maybe it can be moved to "Special".

Perhaps therefore move "Tourism" to here?

So perhaps:

  • Leisure
    ** General
    ** Sports
    ** Swimming / bathing
    ** Hiking routes
    ** Mountain bike routes
    ** Climbing
    ** Tourism

@plepe
Copy link
Owner Author

plepe commented Aug 28, 2019

We could call the first category (Gastro, Shops, ...) "Amenities"?

@Hufkratzer
Copy link
Contributor

In German it would be "Gewerbe", not sure what it is in English, perhaps "Business"?

@plepe
Copy link
Owner Author

plepe commented Jan 11, 2023

I think I will stick with:

  • Gastronomy and Shopping
  • Leisure and Sport

I will also drop the 'Outdoor Activities' layer, and move these sub-categories directly to 'Leisure and Sport'.

I might split the 'Children Amenities'.

Any objections?

@treestryder
Copy link
Contributor

My personal opinion as newcomer. Ignore as you see fit:

Naming is hard and taxonomies harder.

Thinking of folks who would find a great deal of value from OpenStreetBrowser, if only they put a little time and effort into the finding... My general recommendation would be to lean toward (always error on) very broad names at the top level. One click should reveal a category of interest. A second click deeper should show results, or at least a promise of results. Folks are willing to lift every rock to find something but are less likely to lift the rocks they find under the rocks.

If not, a super broad group like "activities", I think; walking, (road) cycling, mountain biking (cycling), paddling and even climbing are all forms of transportation and folks would quickly find them there.

I tried to think about the other groups mentioned, but my mind wants a moment to consider all of the current categories and potential future categories. 🤔

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants