From 33af4cebc109fe79e8a6d9fdeb7f061e15cbe3f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nick Yonge <nick@curiobot.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 17:17:02 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Added attiny84_cw_pinmap board option

Created a board for ATtiny84 using the reverse (clockwise) pin mappinig, as opposed to the default CCW pinmapping. Reads from the "tinyX4_reverse" board variant.

Why? Tldr: the mapping has changed over time, and newer projects generally use CW mapping. It's odd that pio defaults to CCW. Adding this to the list would at least make it easily (and EXPLICITLY, no ambiguity) selectable, without breaking pre-existing projects by modifying the original "attiny84" board.

See https://github.com/SpenceKonde/ATTinyCore/blob/v2.0.0-devThis-is-the-head-submit-PRs-against-this/avr/extras/ATtiny_x4.md for details on why this pinmapping exists.

Found it exhausting to manually add the variant every time despite it pre-existing in the boards list.
---
 boards/attiny84_cw_pinmap | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 boards/attiny84_cw_pinmap

diff --git a/boards/attiny84_cw_pinmap b/boards/attiny84_cw_pinmap
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..82e1183
--- /dev/null
+++ b/boards/attiny84_cw_pinmap
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+{
+  "build": {
+    "core": "tiny",
+    "extra_flags": "-DARDUINO_AVR_ATTINYX4",
+    "f_cpu": "8000000L",
+    "mcu": "attiny84",
+    "variant": "tinyX4_reverse"
+  },
+  "debug": {
+    "simavr_target": "attiny84"
+  },
+  "frameworks": [
+    "arduino"
+  ],
+  "name": "Generic ATtiny84",
+  "upload": {
+    "extra_flags": "-e",
+    "maximum_ram_size": 512,
+    "maximum_size": 8192,
+    "protocol": "usbtiny"
+  },
+  "url": "http://www.atmel.com/devices/ATTINY84.aspx",
+  "vendor": "Atmel"
+}