Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review the configuration template file #8543

Closed
jonasraoni opened this issue Jan 13, 2023 · 8 comments
Closed

Review the configuration template file #8543

jonasraoni opened this issue Jan 13, 2023 · 8 comments
Assignees
Labels
Try Me This issue might be good for a new contributor. Can you help us?
Milestone

Comments

@jonasraoni
Copy link
Contributor

jonasraoni commented Jan 13, 2023

Describe the bug
The configuration across the applications shares most of the settings, but some of them seems to be missing a synchronization, e.g.:

The config of OMP has:
scheduled_tasks_report_error_only = On

The config of OJS has:
show_upgrade_warning = On
citation_checking_max_processes = 3
sitewide_privacy_statement = Off
:

It's needed to compare the settings across OJS/OMP/OPS for main and stable-3_3_0, and ensure the differences make sense.

Some settings seems to be not used:
[general].citation_checking_max_processes
[files].filename_revision_match
[curl].cainfo

What application are you using?
*/main
*/stable-3_3_0

@asmecher asmecher added this to the 3.3.0-19 milestone Jul 29, 2024
@asmecher asmecher added the Try Me This issue might be good for a new contributor. Can you help us? label Jul 29, 2024
@asmecher asmecher modified the milestones: 3.3.0-19, 3.3.0-20 Aug 16, 2024
@kaitlinnewson kaitlinnewson self-assigned this Aug 26, 2024
kaitlinnewson added a commit to kaitlinnewson/omp that referenced this issue Aug 30, 2024
kaitlinnewson added a commit to kaitlinnewson/omp that referenced this issue Aug 30, 2024
kaitlinnewson added a commit to kaitlinnewson/ops that referenced this issue Aug 30, 2024
kaitlinnewson added a commit to kaitlinnewson/ojs that referenced this issue Aug 30, 2024
kaitlinnewson added a commit to kaitlinnewson/ojs that referenced this issue Aug 30, 2024
kaitlinnewson added a commit to kaitlinnewson/omp that referenced this issue Aug 30, 2024
kaitlinnewson added a commit to kaitlinnewson/ops that referenced this issue Aug 30, 2024
@touhidurabir
Copy link
Member

Hi @kaitlinnewson as you are working on this issue , please consider updating the description of validation_timeout under email section . Basically validation_timeout description set as Maximum number of days before an unvalidated account expires and is deleted but in real , it just define time in number of days the validity of validation link in email . The current description of email --> validation_timeout is conflicting and confused with general --> user_validation_period . More details at #10351 .

kaitlinnewson added a commit to kaitlinnewson/omp that referenced this issue Sep 25, 2024
kaitlinnewson added a commit to kaitlinnewson/ojs that referenced this issue Sep 25, 2024
kaitlinnewson added a commit to kaitlinnewson/ops that referenced this issue Sep 25, 2024
kaitlinnewson added a commit to kaitlinnewson/ops that referenced this issue Sep 25, 2024
kaitlinnewson added a commit to kaitlinnewson/omp that referenced this issue Sep 25, 2024
kaitlinnewson added a commit to kaitlinnewson/ops that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2024
kaitlinnewson added a commit to kaitlinnewson/ojs that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2024
kaitlinnewson added a commit to kaitlinnewson/omp that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2024
@kaitlinnewson
Copy link
Member

Hi @touhidurabir, I've improved the messaging for validation_timeout in my current PRs to 3.3, and will take a look at user_validation_period when I am porting to 3.4/main.

@kaitlinnewson
Copy link
Member

@asmecher the PRs above have been updated and are ready for review.

@kaitlinnewson
Copy link
Member

Hi @asmecher, would you have time to give this a look? I'd like to work on this for 3.4/main as well if everything looks good here.

asmecher pushed a commit to pkp/ojs that referenced this issue Nov 12, 2024
asmecher pushed a commit to pkp/ojs that referenced this issue Nov 12, 2024
@asmecher
Copy link
Member

All 3 stable-3_3_0 PRs merged, thanks! Please go ahead with the other branches.

kaitlinnewson added a commit to kaitlinnewson/ojs that referenced this issue Nov 13, 2024
kaitlinnewson added a commit to kaitlinnewson/ojs that referenced this issue Nov 13, 2024
kaitlinnewson added a commit to kaitlinnewson/omp that referenced this issue Nov 13, 2024
kaitlinnewson added a commit to kaitlinnewson/ops that referenced this issue Nov 13, 2024
kaitlinnewson added a commit to kaitlinnewson/omp that referenced this issue Nov 19, 2024
kaitlinnewson added a commit to kaitlinnewson/ojs that referenced this issue Nov 19, 2024
kaitlinnewson added a commit to kaitlinnewson/ops that referenced this issue Nov 19, 2024
@kaitlinnewson
Copy link
Member

@asmecher other branch PRs are now done (listed above) and ready for review.

@asmecher
Copy link
Member

All merged, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Try Me This issue might be good for a new contributor. Can you help us?
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants