Missing files ? "buildGLM.buildModel" "fitGLM" and more ?

[adehad]

Have unsuccessfully tried to run tutorial.m, seemingly because it is unclear what fitGLM and buildGLM.buildModel resolve to.

Initial Point of Failure

neuroGLM/tutorial.m

Lines 120 to 130 in e603491

	%{
	%% Specify the model
	hasBias = true;
	model = buildGLM.buildModel(dspec, 'Poisson', 'exp', hasBias);
	%% Do regression
	[w, stats] = fitGLM(model, dm, y);
	%}
	%% Visualize fit
	visualizeFit(w, model, dspec, vparam(1)); % ???

Line 130 references an unresolved model variable that seems to be set in the previously commented L121-L126.

Uncommenting the commented lines is also funky:

1. buildGLM.buildModel does not exist
2. fitGLM I assume should exist under buildGLM but it does not. Currently it conflicts with Matlab's inbuilt fitglm

Giving a quick look through the available source in this repo neuroGLM\matRegress\+glms\autoFitGLM.m is the closest to actually returning a model, but does not seem to match the function call in L130?

neuroGLM/matRegress/+glms/autoFitGLM.m

Line 1 in e603491

function model = autoFitGLM(X,Y, prspec, varargin)

Likely Further Points of Failures

neuroGLM/tutorial.m

Lines 136 to 141 in e603491

	yPred = generatePrediction(w, model, dmTest);
	ySamp = simulateModel(w, model, dmTest);
	%% Validate model
	gof = goodnessOfFit(w, stats, model, dmTest);
	visualizeGoodnessOfFit(gof);

Afterwards I imagine generatePrediction, simulateModel, goodnessOfFit, visualizeGoodnessOfFit would also be unresolved as I cannot find anything with those names in the repo.

---

Am I missing something obvious? The docs/tutorial.md does seem to suggest another approach using the dm matrix that I can explore further, but I was expecting the tutorial to work in the first instance regardless.

neuroGLM/docs/tutorial.md

Lines 185 to 186 in e603491

	# Regression analysis
	Once you have designed your features, and obtained the design matrix, it's finally time to do some analysis!

[haileygordon]

Also curious about this inquiry above.