Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

develop github workflow for assessment process #2

Open
iantaylor-NOAA opened this issue Nov 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

develop github workflow for assessment process #2

iantaylor-NOAA opened this issue Nov 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@iantaylor-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

iantaylor-NOAA commented Nov 6, 2024

Note: there are currently 11 watchers of this repository. Remember that you can unwatch if you get tired of all the notifications that will surely increase in frequency in the months ahead. Or stay tuned in if you want to watch the yellowtail assessment show.

In 2021 Kelli Johnson introduced me to the idea of assessment repository as R package as described here: https://github.com/pfmc-assessments/lingcod?tab=readme-ov-file#overview. We should decide whether to do that for Yellowtail Rockfish in 2025 and think about other repository organization and workflow questions.

I found the R package approach useful for petrale in 2023 (see https://github.com/pfmc-assessments/petrale/tree/main?tab=readme-ov-file#compiling-the-document). One of the big benefits I saw was that you can create helper functions in an R directory that are automatically loaded by devtools::load_all(). However, with the planned move from sa4ss to asar for the assessment report there may be fewer helper functions needed.

@iantaylor-NOAA iantaylor-NOAA added the question Further information is requested label Nov 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant