-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add option to apply retro to user specified window of years #12
Comments
@brianlangseth-NOAA you can do this by using the |
Perhaps @brianlangseth-NOAA you could suggest changes to the documentation, maybe more links to |
@kellijohnson-NOAA You are right in that years can be specified within the function, upon which all years after that point are removed. Thank you for reminding me of that functionality. There remains a lack of capability to automatically remove only a window of years, and not all years after that window, as well as to remove years at the back end of the time series (i.e. a reverse retrospective). Neither of these are a true retrospective run but rather diagnostics for exploring effects of data on our models. The reverse retrospective can be done by iteratively changing
Utilizing the set up from retro_wrapper could make this automated and easy to explore a range of starting years in one fell swoop. The window approach would be hard because r4ss::Do_retro() changes the starter file retro year, which is coded within SS3 itself |
I think that if we choose to get better at modifying our data files through If excluding a window of years is a common task, we could write a function to loop across all data types to exclude a window of years to make it all the easier within the data file workflow. |
To fully diagnose potential sources of retrospective patterns it would be add functionality to specify a set window of years to do a retrospective analysis on. Similar to this would be to automate the exclusion of entire datasets as well, which could serve both as a sensitivity, but also to explore fixes of possible retrospective patterns.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: