Cluster for states and what that means when sampling #52
Labels
priority: low
The lowest level priority, i.e., not urgent.
status: question
Questions about the issue need answered
topic: code
Related to R code within this package
type: enhancement
Milestone
Clusters are only dealt with in California with respect to weighting the composition data. Should this be looked at for OR and WA as well?
Cluster can easily be included in the Denominator of expansion_1 where it is included for California. Maybe a summary by species for which there are samples in more than one cluster by state would be helpful to see what fisheries would be affected.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: