ENH: Future improvements for BLmotors

[ZryletTC]

1. Remove unnecessary argument handling Originally posted by @ZLLentz in DEV: Add Beamline motors Report Script #91 (comment)
2. Remove exec call Originally posted by @ZLLentz in DEV: Add Beamline motors Report Script #91 (comment)
3. Remove unnecessary tuple creation for res Originally posted by @ZLLentz in DEV: Add Beamline motors Report Script #91 (comment)
4. Clean up file handling Originally posted by @ZLLentz in DEV: Add Beamline motors Report Script #91 (comment)
5. Simplify device sorting logic Originally posted by @ZLLentz in DEV: Add Beamline motors Report Script #91 (comment)
6. Fix other things left over from Mike's code...
7. Parallelize EPICS calls Originally posted by @ZLLentz in DEV: Add Beamline motors Report Script #91 (comment)
8. Maybe rename?

[silkenelson]

Just clarifying here that this script was not originally be intended to be performant: it's a first check to make the state of the beamline motors sane. In the end, I was assuming we'd have some code in beam line python that would make a list of all beam line motors and check if they are configured as they are supposed to and maybe state the differences if not - this could become part of ATEF which might mean a different solution again. Treat the current script with the care that fits this.

[ZLLentz]

I guess I shouldn't have reviewed it so closely then, sorry about that. I didn't have the proper context and assumed we'd be re-using and continuing to maintain the code.