You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Several API designs rely on using first party data to obtain better utility. Since, the computation infrastructure is most often not ran by the party who owns such first party data, there is a question whether sharing such first party data with the parties running the measurement infrastructure is OK or whether we should aim to provide privacy for such data. The privacy issue here is not the usual user privacy we have discussed - there is a party who owns this data (however, this party may have commitments on how it uses/shares such data). The question here is whether we want to have designs that require sharing of first party data in order to obtain utility.
I am not sure there is any need to follow - I think based on the discussion we made a decision and I will be writing a paragraph that reflects the decisions to be added to the threat model document.
Several API designs rely on using first party data to obtain better utility. Since, the computation infrastructure is most often not ran by the party who owns such first party data, there is a question whether sharing such first party data with the parties running the measurement infrastructure is OK or whether we should aim to provide privacy for such data. The privacy issue here is not the usual user privacy we have discussed - there is a party who owns this data (however, this party may have commitments on how it uses/shares such data). The question here is whether we want to have designs that require sharing of first party data in order to obtain utility.
More discussion is this issue: patcg-individual-drafts/ipa#77
20 min talk + 25 min discussion
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: