You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There has been considerable interest in supporting event level outputs in IPA (IPA issue 60, PATCG issue 41). This was discussed at the May 2023 PATCG meeting where the consensus was we could support this so long as we can enforce a per user bound on the information released.
I've been working on outlining (#70 ) how to do this with an Event Labeling Query that labels events with noisy labels and can be done in a way that lets us maintain a per matchkey DP bound. Would be great to iterate with this group on the requirements and initial design.
Time
~30min
Issue Link
I opened as a PR on the end-to-end doc as I think that will be an easier place to iterate on the design than in an issue #70
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Agenda+: What do you want to discuss?
There has been considerable interest in supporting event level outputs in IPA (IPA issue 60, PATCG issue 41). This was discussed at the May 2023 PATCG meeting where the consensus was we could support this so long as we can enforce a per user bound on the information released.
I've been working on outlining (#70 ) how to do this with an Event Labeling Query that labels events with noisy labels and can be done in a way that lets us maintain a per matchkey DP bound. Would be great to iterate with this group on the requirements and initial design.
Time
~30min
Issue Link
I opened as a PR on the end-to-end doc as I think that will be an easier place to iterate on the design than in an issue #70
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: