Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pallet_revive launch tracking issue #5308

Open
18 of 35 tasks
athei opened this issue Aug 9, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
18 of 35 tasks

pallet_revive launch tracking issue #5308

athei opened this issue Aug 9, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@athei
Copy link
Member

athei commented Aug 9, 2024

This issue tracks all the open changes that we need to make to pallet_revive so it can YUL contracts. This is only the minimal feature set for the deployment and does not include features that need to be delivered later (JIT). It also only includes changes to the pallet and not other components.

I ordered them by urgency.

Tasks

  1. pgherveou
  2. pgherveou
  3. pgherveou
  4. 2 of 2
    athei
  5. athei
  6. pgherveou
  7. R0-silent T7-smart_contracts
  8. R0-silent T7-smart_contracts
  9. R0-silent T7-smart_contracts
  10. R0-silent T7-smart_contracts
  11. R0-silent T7-smart_contracts
  12. athei
  13. pgherveou
  14. pgherveou
  15. pgherveou
  16. athei
  17. athei
  18. pgherveou
  19. pgherveou
  20. R0-silent
@athei athei self-assigned this Aug 9, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Backlog 🗒 in Smart Contracts Aug 9, 2024
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2024
This is a heavily modified and stripped down version of
`pallet_contracts`. We decided to fork instead of extend the old pallet.
Reasons for that are:

- There is no benefit of supporting both on the same pallet as the
intended payload for the new pallet (recompiled YUL) will be using a
different ABI.
- It is much easier since it allows us to remove all the code that was
necessary to support Wasm and focus fully on running cross compiled YUL
contracts.

**The code is reviewable but can't be merged because it depends on an
unreleased version of PolkaVM via git.**

## Current state

All tests are passing and the code is not quick and dirty but written to
last. The work is not finished, though. It is included in the
`kitchensink-runtime` and a node can be built. However, we merge early
in order to be able to start testing other components as early as
possible.

Outstanding changes are tracked here and will be merged separately:
#5308

## Syscall Interface

The syscall interface is best explored by generating the docs of this
crate and looking at the `SyscallDoc` trait. Arguments are passed in
registers a0-a5 in the order they are listed. If there are more than 6
arguments (call, instantiate) a pointer to a packed struct of the
arguments is expected as the only argument. I plan to create variants of
those syscalls with less arguments specifically for YUL.

Functions are just referenced by their name as ASCII within the PolkaVM
container. Rather than by a syscall number as it was the case in the
last implementation.
 

## Changes vs. `pallet_contracts`

The changes are too numerous to list them all here. This is an
incomplete list:

- Use PolkaVM instead of wasmi to execute contracts
- Made Runtime generic over a new `Memory` trait as we can't map memory
directly on PolkaVM anymore
- No static verification on code upload. Everything is a determinstic
runtime failure
- Removed all migrations and reset the pallet version
- Removed the nonce storage item and instead use the deployers account
nonce to generate a unique trie
- We now bump the deployers account nonce on contract instantiation to
they are bumped even within a batch transaction
- Removed the instantiation nonce host function: We should add a new
`instantiate` variant as a replacement for thos
- ContractInfoOf of uses the indentity hasher now
- Remove the determinism feature: User of that feature should switch to
soft floats
- The `unstable` attribute has been replaced by a `api_version`
attribute to declare at which version an API became available
	- leaving out that attribute makes the API effectively unstable
- a new `api_version` field on the CodeInfo makes sure that old
contracts can't access new APIs (necessary due to lack of static
verification.
- Added a `behaviour_version` field to CodeInfo that can used if we need
to introduce breaking changes and keep the old behaviour for existing
contracts
- Unified storage vs. transient and fixed vs. variable sized keys all
into one set of multiplexing host functions
- Removed all contract observeable limits from the `Config` trait and
instead hardcode them
- Removed the Schedule
- Removed all deprecated host functions
- Simplify chain extension as preperation for making it a pre-compile

---------

Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Backlog 🗒
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant